Well, a few months ago, I read a great series of posts on this topic on Jimmy Akin's blog. Jimmy Akin is a Catholic apologist who is very well-read and knowledgeable in areas such as moral theology, ancient languages, and Biblical scholarship. He is a also a very clear thinker who backs up his claims with detailed documentation and sound logic.
In this series of posts, Jimmy considers the pros and cons of five different possible interpretations of the creation account in Genesis, based on the following criteria:
The question I'm asking is: "Given what the text says, how likely is it that this is the correct interpretation of the text?" . . . My interest is in figuring out what the text most likely means taken on its own terms, not trying to harmonize it with modern science.
I found Jimmy's conclusions to be very interesting, and perhaps slightly surprising. Admittedly his conclusions are just his own opinion, but he makes some convincing arguments. Here is a link to the entire series of posts on a single page:
Genesis One
Or here are separate links, in order, for each post:
1. Interpreting Genesis One
2. The Day-Age Interpretation
3. The Revelatory Day Interpretation
4. The Gap Interpretation
5. The Ordinary Day Interpretation
6. The Framework Interpretation
No comments:
Post a Comment